The Legal Definition of Children


The biological sciences define a child as a human being between the developmental period of infancy and puberty. However, the legal definition includes the fetus until birth. As a result, children have fewer rights than adults. Therefore, they must always remain under the care of a responsible adult. This is known as child custody. Here are some characteristics of children that may differ from the typical definition of a child. This article will address these differences and provide more insight into the differences between children and adults.

The United Nations 1989 defines a child as a human being below the age of eighteen. Since children do not have the capacity to make rational decisions, they should not be granted liberty rights. The law also recognizes that children should not be subjected to unfair treatment. While adults have the ability to make unwise decisions, children do not. Furthermore, the choices they make in childhood will have a lasting impact on their lives. This makes it essential for governments to provide support for parents who are unable to raise their children.

In addition to this, it is important to remember that there are some instances where a child’s death may be a result of criminal negligence. A second-degree murder charge can be added if the prosecutor can prove that the death was the result of criminal negligence. For example, the mother may have accidentally left her child alone in a bathtub, resulting in the drowning of the infant. This is an extremely serious situation that may warrant a second-degree murder charge.

While some people argue that children should have rights, there are also those who believe that they should not have any rights at all. These people, called sceptical liberationists, claim that children do not deserve to have rights and are not like adults. They argue in three different ways:

Will theorists do not want to deny that children have rights, but they do argue that they should have representatives who can exercise their choice. This proxy exercise of choice would occur only if the children were incapable of exercising their own rights. Although the child cannot exercise choice, the proxy would exercise the right on their behalf, which acknowledges that children will one day become capable of exercising their own rights. So, a child should have a representative when they cannot.

In addition to these rights, children should have the right to speak their native language and culture. They should also have the right to play and participate in cultural activities. They should also be protected from dangerous work and sexual exploitation. Furthermore, they should not be put in prison for life, but should only be incarcerated for a short time. This is important in order to prevent the child from losing their identity. The rights of children are essential for their survival.

The modern attitude towards children emerged in the late nineteenth century, when the Victorian upper classes began to emphasize the importance of family life and the sanctity of the child. This attitude has remained dominant in many Western societies to this day. With the rise of industrialisation, a divergence emerged between children’s ideals and the reality of their exploitation. For example, children in the United Kingdom were specially employed in factories, mines, and chimney sweeps. In these jobs, children were exposed to dangerous conditions and often received low wages. The contrast between children’s conditions and the middle-class ideal of childhood spurred the first campaigns for child rights.